photography: be related to physics

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hobby
Weight: 0.67
, art
Weight: 0.65
, medium
Weight: 0.64
, invention
Weight: 0.64
, passion
Weight: 0.62
Siblings painting
Weight: 0.35
, watercolor
Weight: 0.35
, calligraphy
Weight: 0.34
, needlework
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to physics 1.00
be related to math 0.80
be related to geometry 0.80
is science 0.79
relate to science 0.79
be used in astronomy 0.78
relates to biology 0.77
be less important than math science 0.77
be related to technology 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(invention, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(photography, be related to physics)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(photography, be related to physics)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(invention, relate to science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(photography, be related to physics)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(invention, relate to science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(invention, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(photography, be related to physics)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(photography, be related to physics)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(photography, be related to physics)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(photography, be related to physics)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(photography, be related to physics)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(photography, relates to biology)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(photography, be related to physics)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(photography, relates to biology)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(photography, be related to physics)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(photography, relates to biology)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(photography, be related to physics)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(photography, be related to math)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(photography, be related to physics)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(photography, be related to math)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(photography, be related to physics)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(photography, be related to math)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(photography, be related to physics)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(photography, relates to biology)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(photography, be related to physics)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(photography, be used in astronomy)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(photography, be related to physics)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(photography, be used in astronomy)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(photography, be related to physics)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(photography, be used in astronomy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(photography, be related to physics)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(photography, be related to math)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(photography, be related to physics)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(photography, be used in astronomy)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(photography, be related to physics)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(photography, is science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(photography, be related to physics)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(photography, is science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(photography, be related to physics)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(photography, is science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(photography, be related to physics)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(photography, is science)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(photography, be related to physics)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(photography, be related to technology)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(photography, be related to physics)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(photography, be related to technology)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(photography, be related to physics)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(photography, be related to technology)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(photography, be related to physics)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(photography, be related to technology)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(photography, be related to physics)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(photography, be related to physics)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(photography, be related to physics)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(photography, be related to physics)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(photography, be related to physics)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(photography, be related to physics)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(invention, relate to science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(photography, be related to physics)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(invention, relate to science)