photography: CAN can considered

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hobby
Weight: 0.67
, art
Weight: 0.65
, medium
Weight: 0.64
, invention
Weight: 0.64
, passion
Weight: 0.62
Siblings painting
Weight: 0.35
, watercolor
Weight: 0.35
, calligraphy
Weight: 0.34
, needlework
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
CAN can considered 1.00
be considered as means 0.81
be is used 0.81
have used for portfollios 0.77
be considered difficult 0.77
be considered good 0.76
is needed 0.75
is hard even made 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(medium, is hard even made)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(photography, CAN can considered)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(invention, is needed)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(photography, CAN can considered)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(photography, CAN can considered)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(invention, is needed)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(photography, CAN can considered)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(medium, is hard even made)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(photography, CAN can considered)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(medium, is hard even made)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(photography, CAN can considered)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(invention, is needed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(photography, CAN can considered)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(watercolor, be considered difficult)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(medium, is hard even made)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(photography, CAN can considered)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(photography, CAN can considered)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(invention, is needed)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(photography, CAN can considered)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(photography, CAN can considered)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(photography, CAN can considered)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(watercolor, be considered difficult)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(watercolor, be considered difficult)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(photography, CAN can considered)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(photography, CAN can considered)

Similarity expansion

0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(photography, CAN can considered)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(photography, is needed)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(photography, CAN can considered)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(photography, is needed)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(photography, CAN can considered)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(photography, is needed)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(photography, CAN can considered)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(photography, is needed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(photography, CAN can considered)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(photography, CAN can considered)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(photography, CAN can considered)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(photography, CAN can considered)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(photography, CAN can considered)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(photography, CAN can considered)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(invention, is needed)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(photography, CAN can considered)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(medium, is hard even made)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(photography, CAN can considered)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(watercolor, be considered difficult)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(photography, CAN can considered)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(invention, is needed)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(photography, CAN can considered)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(medium, is hard even made)