photography: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hobby
Weight: 0.67
, art
Weight: 0.65
, medium
Weight: 0.64
, invention
Weight: 0.64
, passion
Weight: 0.62
Siblings painting
Weight: 0.35
, watercolor
Weight: 0.35
, calligraphy
Weight: 0.34
, needlework
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality change 0.86
has quality wrong 0.85
has quality worth 0.85
has quality full 0.84
is good value 0.81
is great 0.81
be good for health 0.80
has quality shit 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(medium, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(photography, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(hobby, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(photography, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(art, is great)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(photography, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hobby, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(photography, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(invention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(photography, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(passion, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(photography, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(medium, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(photography, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(passion, is good value)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(photography, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(passion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(photography, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(invention, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(photography, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(passion, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(invention, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(passion, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(invention, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(medium, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(hobby, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(medium, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(hobby, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(passion, is good value)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(art, is great)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(invention, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(passion, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(medium, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(passion, is good value)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(invention, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hobby, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(hobby, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(medium, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(art, is great)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(passion, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(watercolor, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(painting, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(watercolor, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(painting, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(medium, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(photography, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(hobby, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(photography, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hobby, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(photography, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(invention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(photography, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(art, is great)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(photography, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(passion, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(photography, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(medium, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(photography, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(passion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(photography, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(invention, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(photography, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(passion, is good value)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(photography, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(painting, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(painting, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(watercolor, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(watercolor, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(watercolor, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(watercolor, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(painting, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(painting, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(photography, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(photography, is great)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(photography, is great)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(photography, is great)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(photography, is great)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(photography, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(photography, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(passion, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(passion, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(invention, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(passion, is good value)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(medium, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(invention, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(medium, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(hobby, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(hobby, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(art, is great)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(watercolor, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(painting, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(watercolor, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(painting, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(passion, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(invention, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(medium, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(hobby, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(passion, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(invention, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(medium, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(hobby, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(passion, is good value)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(art, is great)