photography: is great

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hobby
Weight: 0.67
, art
Weight: 0.65
, medium
Weight: 0.64
, invention
Weight: 0.64
, passion
Weight: 0.62
Siblings painting
Weight: 0.35
, watercolor
Weight: 0.35
, calligraphy
Weight: 0.34
, needlework
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is great 1.00
is amazing 0.84
has quality good 0.81
is big 0.80
is terrible 0.79
is rare good 0.79
be considered good 0.77
is rare best 0.77
be important to us 0.77
is good job 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(art, is great)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(photography, is great)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(medium, is rare good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(photography, is great)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(medium, is rare best)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(photography, is great)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(medium, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(photography, is great)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(hobby, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(photography, is great)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(invention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(photography, is great)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(passion, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(photography, is great)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(invention, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(photography, is great)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(art, is great)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(passion, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(invention, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(hobby, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(medium, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(invention, be important to us)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(medium, is rare good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(medium, is rare best)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(art, is great)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(medium, is rare good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(medium, is rare best)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(invention, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(hobby, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(medium, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(passion, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(invention, be important to us)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(watercolor, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(painting, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(art, is great)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(photography, is great)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(medium, is rare good)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(photography, is great)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(medium, is rare best)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(photography, is great)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(medium, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(photography, is great)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(hobby, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(photography, is great)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(invention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(photography, is great)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(passion, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(photography, is great)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(invention, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(photography, is great)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(painting, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(painting, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(watercolor, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(watercolor, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(photography, is great)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(photography, is amazing)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(photography, is amazing)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(photography, has quality good)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(photography, has quality good)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(photography, is amazing)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(photography, has quality good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(photography, is good job)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(photography, is good job)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(photography, is good job)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(photography, is amazing)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(photography, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(photography, is good job)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(photography, is great)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(photography, is great)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(passion, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(invention, be important to us)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(invention, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(medium, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(hobby, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(art, is great)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(medium, is rare good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(medium, is rare best)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(watercolor, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(painting, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(art, is great)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(passion, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(invention, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(medium, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(hobby, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(medium, is rare good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(invention, be important to us)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(photography, is great)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(medium, is rare best)