photography: is video

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hobby
Weight: 0.67
, art
Weight: 0.65
, medium
Weight: 0.64
, invention
Weight: 0.64
, passion
Weight: 0.62
Siblings painting
Weight: 0.35
, watercolor
Weight: 0.35
, calligraphy
Weight: 0.34
, needlework
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is video 1.00
be better than video 0.87
has state pictures 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(photography, is video) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(painting, has state pictures)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(photography, is video) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(painting, has state pictures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(painting, has state pictures)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(photography, is video) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(photography, is video)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(photography, is video) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(photography, be better than video)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(photography, is video) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(photography, be better than video)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(photography, is video) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(photography, be better than video)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(photography, is video) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(photography, be better than video)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(photography, is video) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(photography, is video) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(photography, is video)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(photography, is video) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(photography, is video)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(photography, is video) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(painting, has state pictures)