photography: was created

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hobby
Weight: 0.67
, art
Weight: 0.65
, medium
Weight: 0.64
, invention
Weight: 0.64
, passion
Weight: 0.62
Siblings painting
Weight: 0.35
, watercolor
Weight: 0.35
, calligraphy
Weight: 0.34
, needlework
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was created 1.00
was created before technology 0.84
be created in places 0.84
was developed 0.83
was created in persia 0.82
was invented 0.79
be formed 0.77
was created in ancient persia 0.76
was discovered 0.76
was founded 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(art, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(photography, was created)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(art, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(photography, was created)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(photography, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(art, was created)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(photography, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(art, was invented)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(photography, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(art, was created)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(photography, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(art, was invented)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(photography, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, was invented)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(photography, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(watercolor, be formed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(art, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(photography, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(photography, was created)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(art, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(photography, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(photography, was created)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(photography, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(watercolor, be formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(watercolor, be formed)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(photography, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(calligraphy, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(calligraphy, was invented)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(photography, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(photography, was created)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(photography, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(photography, was developed)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(photography, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(photography, was developed)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(photography, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(photography, was developed)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(photography, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(photography, was developed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(photography, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(photography, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(photography, was created)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(photography, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(photography, was created)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(photography, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(art, was created)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(photography, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(art, was invented)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(photography, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(watercolor, be formed)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(photography, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(calligraphy, was invented)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(photography, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(art, was created)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(photography, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(art, was invented)