photon: have frequency

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents particle
Weight: 0.77
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.60
, object
Weight: 0.57
, atom
Weight: 0.57
Siblings gamma ray
Weight: 0.78
, alpha particle
Weight: 0.40
, beta particle
Weight: 0.39
, electron
Weight: 0.38
, neutrino
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
have frequency 1.00
is frequency 0.99
have different frequencies 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(photon, have frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(gamma ray, have frequency)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(photon, have frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(gamma ray, have frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(gamma ray, have frequency)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(photon, have frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(photon, have frequency)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(photon, have frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(photon, is frequency)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(photon, have frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(photon, is frequency)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(photon, have frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(photon, is frequency)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(photon, have frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(photon, have different frequencies)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(photon, have frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(photon, is frequency)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(photon, have frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(photon, have different frequencies)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(photon, have frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(photon, have different frequencies)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(photon, have frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(photon, have different frequencies)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(photon, have frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(photon, have frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(photon, have frequency)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(photon, have frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(photon, have frequency)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(photon, have frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(gamma ray, have frequency)