physicist: be obsessed with child porn violation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scientist
Weight: 0.74
, computer scientist
Weight: 0.70
, specialist
Weight: 0.62
, expert
Weight: 0.60
, engineer
Weight: 0.57
Siblings enrico fermi
Weight: 0.55
, ernest rutherford
Weight: 0.53
, niels bohr
Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property Similarity
be obsessed with child porn violation 1.00
be bad at sex 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(physicist, be obsessed with child porn violation)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(physicist, be obsessed with child porn violation)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(physicist, be obsessed with child porn violation)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(physicist, be bad at sex)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(physicist, be obsessed with child porn violation)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(physicist, be bad at sex)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(physicist, be obsessed with child porn violation)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(physicist, be bad at sex)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(physicist, be obsessed with child porn violation)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(physicist, be bad at sex)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(physicist, be obsessed with child porn violation)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(physicist, be obsessed with child porn violation)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(physicist, be obsessed with child porn violation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(physicist, be obsessed with child porn violation)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(physicist, be obsessed with child porn violation)