physicist: call biology soft science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scientist
Weight: 0.74
, specialist
Weight: 0.62
, expert
Weight: 0.60
, engineer
Weight: 0.57
Siblings ludwig boltzmann
Weight: 0.58
, enrico fermi
Weight: 0.55
, james clerk maxwell
Weight: 0.54
, ernest rutherford
Weight: 0.53
, niels bohr
Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property Similarity
call biology soft science 1.00
call biology science 0.96
use science 0.87
use mathematics explain 0.77
see physics 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(engineer, use science)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(physicist, call biology soft science)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(physicist, call biology soft science)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(engineer, use science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(physicist, call biology soft science)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(engineer, use science)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(physicist, call biology soft science)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(physicist, call biology soft science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(physicist, call biology soft science)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(physicist, call biology soft science)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(physicist, call biology soft science)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(physicist, use science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(physicist, call biology soft science)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(physicist, use science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(physicist, call biology soft science)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(physicist, see physics)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(physicist, call biology soft science)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(physicist, see physics)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(physicist, call biology soft science)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(physicist, use science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(physicist, call biology soft science)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(physicist, use mathematics explain)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(physicist, call biology soft science)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(physicist, use mathematics explain)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(physicist, call biology soft science)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(physicist, use mathematics explain)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(physicist, call biology soft science)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(physicist, use mathematics explain)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(physicist, call biology soft science)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(physicist, see physics)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(physicist, call biology soft science)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(physicist, use science)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(physicist, call biology soft science)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(physicist, see physics)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(physicist, call biology soft science)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(physicist, call biology soft science)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(physicist, call biology soft science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(physicist, call biology soft science)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(physicist, call biology soft science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(physicist, call biology soft science)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(engineer, use science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(physicist, call biology soft science)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(engineer, use science)