physicist: name new particles

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scientist
Weight: 0.74
, computer scientist
Weight: 0.70
, specialist
Weight: 0.62
, expert
Weight: 0.60
, engineer
Weight: 0.57
Siblings enrico fermi
Weight: 0.55
, ernest rutherford
Weight: 0.53
, niels bohr
Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property Similarity
name new particles 1.00
entangle two particles 0.78
entangle particles 0.78
create electron beams 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(physicist, name new particles)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(physicist, name new particles)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(physicist, name new particles)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(physicist, entangle two particles)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(physicist, name new particles)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(physicist, entangle particles)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(physicist, name new particles)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(physicist, entangle two particles)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(physicist, name new particles)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(physicist, entangle particles)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(physicist, name new particles)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(physicist, create electron beams)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(physicist, name new particles)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(physicist, create electron beams)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(physicist, name new particles)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(physicist, entangle two particles)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(physicist, name new particles)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(physicist, entangle particles)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(physicist, name new particles)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(physicist, create electron beams)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(physicist, name new particles)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(physicist, entangle particles)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(physicist, name new particles)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(physicist, create electron beams)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(physicist, name new particles)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(physicist, entangle two particles)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(physicist, name new particles)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(physicist, name new particles)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(physicist, name new particles)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(physicist, name new particles)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(physicist, name new particles)