physics: be hard compared to math

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.67
, department
Weight: 0.64
, class
Weight: 0.59
, field
Weight: 0.58
, teacher
Weight: 0.56
Siblings quantum physics
Weight: 0.70
, computer science
Weight: 0.38
, mathematics
Weight: 0.37
, biology
Weight: 0.36
, metaphysics
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be hard compared to math 1.00
be harder than math 0.88
compare to math 0.88
be tied to mathematics 0.79
be harder than chemistry 0.76
is level hard 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(physics, be hard compared to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(biology, be harder than chemistry)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(physics, be hard compared to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(biology, be harder than chemistry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(biology, be harder than chemistry)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(physics, be hard compared to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(physics, be hard compared to math)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(physics, be hard compared to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(physics, be harder than math)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(physics, be hard compared to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(physics, compare to math)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(physics, be hard compared to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(physics, be harder than math)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(physics, be hard compared to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(physics, compare to math)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(physics, be hard compared to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(physics, be harder than chemistry)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(physics, be hard compared to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(physics, be tied to mathematics)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(physics, be hard compared to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(physics, compare to math)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(physics, be hard compared to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(physics, be harder than math)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(physics, be hard compared to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(physics, compare to math)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(physics, be hard compared to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(physics, be harder than math)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(physics, be hard compared to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(physics, be harder than chemistry)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(physics, be hard compared to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(physics, be tied to mathematics)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(physics, be hard compared to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(physics, be harder than chemistry)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(physics, be hard compared to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(physics, be tied to mathematics)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(physics, be hard compared to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(physics, be harder than chemistry)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(physics, be hard compared to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(physics, be tied to mathematics)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(physics, be hard compared to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(physics, be hard compared to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(physics, be hard compared to math)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(physics, be hard compared to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(physics, be hard compared to math)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(physics, be hard compared to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(biology, be harder than chemistry)