physics: relate in technology

Related concepts

Parents	science Weight: 0.67 , department Weight: 0.64 , class Weight: 0.59 , field Weight: 0.58 , teacher Weight: 0.56
Siblings	quantum physics Weight: 0.70 , computer science Weight: 0.38 , mathematics Weight: 0.37 , biology Weight: 0.36 , metaphysics Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
relate in technology	1.00
be related to technology	0.90
affect development of technology	0.85
be contribute to technology	0.85
produce different technologies	0.83
relate to sports	0.80
relate to chemistry	0.79
be related to clinical technology studies	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(science, be related to technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(physics, relate in technology)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(physics, relate in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(science, be related to technology)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.01

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(physics, relate in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(science, be related to technology)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(physics, relate in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(biology, relate to sports)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(science, be related to technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(physics, relate in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(physics, relate in technology)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(physics, relate in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(biology, relate to sports) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(biology, relate to sports)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(physics, relate in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Salient(physics, relate in technology)

Similarity expansion

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(physics, relate in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(physics, be related to technology)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(physics, relate in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(physics, be contribute to technology)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(physics, relate in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(physics, relate to chemistry)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(physics, relate in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(physics, be related to clinical technology studies)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(physics, relate in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Typical(physics, be contribute to technology)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(physics, relate in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Typical(physics, relate to chemistry)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(physics, relate in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Typical(physics, be related to technology)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.61

Salient(physics, relate in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Salient(physics, be related to technology)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.61

Salient(physics, relate in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Salient(physics, be contribute to technology)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.61

Salient(physics, relate in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Salient(physics, relate to chemistry)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(physics, relate in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(physics, be contribute to technology)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(physics, relate in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(physics, be related to technology)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(physics, relate in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(physics, relate to chemistry)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.61

Salient(physics, relate in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Salient(physics, be related to clinical technology studies)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(physics, relate in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Plausible(physics, be related to clinical technology studies)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(physics, relate in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(physics, be related to clinical technology studies)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

Salient(physics, relate in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(physics, relate in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(physics, relate in technology)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(physics, relate in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(physics, relate in technology)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(physics, relate in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(science, be related to technology)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(physics, relate in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(biology, relate to sports)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(physics, relate in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(science, be related to technology)