piano: be better than keyboards

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents percussion instrument
Weight: 0.74
, stringed instrument
Weight: 0.69
, musical instrument
Weight: 0.67
, brass instrument
Weight: 0.65
Siblings upright piano
Weight: 0.70
, cello
Weight: 0.53
, violin
Weight: 0.41
, bass guitar
Weight: 0.40
, vibraphone
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than keyboards 1.00
have two keyboards 0.93
be harder than guitar 0.83
be more expensive than guitars 0.81
be more expensive than pianos 0.79
is keyboard layout 0.78
have thicker strings than violin 0.78
be better than new violins 0.77
be better than violins 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(piano, be better than keyboards)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(violin, be harder than guitar)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(piano, be better than keyboards)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(violin, be more expensive than guitars)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(piano, be better than keyboards)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(violin, be more expensive than pianos)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(piano, be better than keyboards)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cello, have thicker strings than violin)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(piano, be better than keyboards)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(violin, be better than new violins)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(piano, be better than keyboards)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(violin, be harder than guitar)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(violin, be harder than guitar)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(piano, be better than keyboards)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(violin, be more expensive than guitars)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(violin, be more expensive than guitars)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(piano, be better than keyboards)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(violin, be more expensive than pianos)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(violin, be more expensive than pianos)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(piano, be better than keyboards)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(cello, have thicker strings than violin)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(cello, have thicker strings than violin)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(piano, be better than keyboards)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(violin, be better than new violins)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(violin, be better than new violins)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(piano, be better than keyboards)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(piano, be better than keyboards)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(piano, be better than keyboards)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(piano, have two keyboards)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(piano, be better than keyboards)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(piano, have two keyboards)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(piano, be better than keyboards)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(piano, have two keyboards)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(piano, be better than keyboards)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(piano, be harder than guitar)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(piano, be better than keyboards)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(piano, be harder than guitar)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(piano, be better than keyboards)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(piano, be harder than guitar)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(piano, be better than keyboards)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(piano, have two keyboards)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(piano, be better than keyboards)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(piano, is keyboard layout)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(piano, be better than keyboards)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(piano, be harder than guitar)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(piano, be better than keyboards)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(piano, is keyboard layout)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(piano, be better than keyboards)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(piano, is keyboard layout)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(piano, be better than keyboards)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(piano, is keyboard layout)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(piano, be better than keyboards)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(piano, be better than keyboards)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(piano, be better than keyboards)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(piano, be better than keyboards)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(piano, be better than keyboards)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(piano, be better than keyboards)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(violin, be harder than guitar)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(piano, be better than keyboards)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(violin, be more expensive than guitars)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(piano, be better than keyboards)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(violin, be more expensive than pianos)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(piano, be better than keyboards)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(cello, have thicker strings than violin)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(piano, be better than keyboards)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(violin, be better than new violins)