pickle: taste good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.64
, pickled food
Weight: 0.61
, product
Weight: 0.60
, dish
Weight: 0.58
Siblings sauerkraut
Weight: 0.56
, potato salad
Weight: 0.35
, meat pie
Weight: 0.35
, apple pie
Weight: 0.35
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste good 1.00
taste 0.95
taste like chocolate 0.86
has quality good 0.79
is good luck 0.76
has sweetness sweet 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(pickle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(apple pie, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(pickle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(potato salad, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(pickle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(sauerkraut, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(pickle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(spaghetti sauce, has sweetness sweet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(pickle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(spaghetti sauce, has sweetness sweet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(spaghetti sauce, has sweetness sweet)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(pickle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(sauerkraut, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(sauerkraut, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(pickle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(potato salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(potato salad, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(pickle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(apple pie, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(apple pie, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(pickle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(pickle, taste good)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(pickle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(pickle, taste)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(pickle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(pickle, taste)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(pickle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pickle, taste like chocolate)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(pickle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(pickle, taste)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(pickle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(pickle, taste like chocolate)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(pickle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(pickle, taste like chocolate)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(pickle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(pickle, taste like chocolate)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(pickle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(pickle, taste)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(pickle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pickle, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(pickle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(pickle, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(pickle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(pickle, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(pickle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(pickle, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(pickle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(pickle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(pickle, taste good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(pickle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(pickle, taste good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(pickle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(spaghetti sauce, has sweetness sweet)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(pickle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(sauerkraut, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(pickle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(apple pie, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(pickle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(potato salad, has quality good)