pie: be good with ice cream

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents apple pie
Weight: 0.75
, dish
Weight: 0.66
, dessert
Weight: 0.65
, item
Weight: 0.57
, junk food
Weight: 0.56
Siblings chocolate cake
Weight: 0.37
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.36
, custard
Weight: 0.36
, cake
Weight: 0.36
, chili
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good with ice cream 1.00
be ice by add ice 0.86
has ice on top and side 0.83
has ice or frost on it 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(pie, be good with ice cream) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(cake, be ice by add ice)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(pie, be good with ice cream) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(cake, has ice on top and side)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(pie, be good with ice cream) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(cake, has ice or frost on it)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(pie, be good with ice cream) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(cake, be ice by add ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(cake, be ice by add ice)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(pie, be good with ice cream) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(cake, has ice on top and side) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(cake, has ice on top and side)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(pie, be good with ice cream) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(cake, has ice or frost on it) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(cake, has ice or frost on it)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(pie, be good with ice cream) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(pie, be good with ice cream)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(pie, be good with ice cream) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(pie, be good with ice cream) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(pie, be good with ice cream)

Typical implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(pie, be good with ice cream) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(pie, be good with ice cream)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(pie, be good with ice cream) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(cake, be ice by add ice)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(pie, be good with ice cream) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(cake, has ice on top and side)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(pie, be good with ice cream) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(cake, has ice or frost on it)