pie: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents apple pie
Weight: 0.75
, dish
Weight: 0.66
, dessert
Weight: 0.65
, item
Weight: 0.57
, junk food
Weight: 0.56
Siblings chocolate cake
Weight: 0.37
, meat pie
Weight: 0.37
, cheesecake
Weight: 0.36
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.36
, tiramisu
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
is quality 0.91
be good 0.86
is good for 0.86
was good 0.84
is great 0.81
feel good 0.80
be good for us 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junk food, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pie, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(apple pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pie, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pie, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(dessert, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pie, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, be good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pie, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(junk food, is quality)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pie, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pie, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(junk food, feel good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pie, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(dish, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pie, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(dessert, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pie, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(apple pie, be good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pie, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(dessert, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(dish, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(apple pie, be good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(dessert, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(apple pie, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(junk food, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(junk food, is quality)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(junk food, be good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(junk food, feel good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(junk food, be good for us)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(dish, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(apple pie, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(apple pie, be good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is quality)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good for us)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(junk food, feel good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(tiramisu, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tiramisu, is good for)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cheesecake, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tiramisu, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(tiramisu, has quality better)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chocolate cake, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junk food, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(pie, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(apple pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(pie, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(dessert, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(pie, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(pie, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(junk food, is quality)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(pie, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, be good)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(pie, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(dish, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(pie, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(pie, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(junk food, feel good)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(pie, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(dessert, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(pie, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(apple pie, be good)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(pie, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(chocolate cake, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(chocolate cake, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(tiramisu, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(tiramisu, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(cheesecake, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(cheesecake, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(tiramisu, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(tiramisu, has quality better)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(tiramisu, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(tiramisu, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(tiramisu, is good for)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(tiramisu, is good for)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(pie, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(pie, was good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(pie, was good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(pie, is great)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(pie, was good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(pie, is great)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(pie, is great)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pie, was good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(pie, is great)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pie, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pie, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(dessert, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(dish, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(apple pie, be good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dessert, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(junk food, is quality)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(junk food, feel good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(apple pie, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, be good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(junk food, be good for us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(chocolate cake, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(tiramisu, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(tiramisu, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(tiramisu, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(cheesecake, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(tiramisu, is good for)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(dessert, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dessert, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(dish, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(apple pie, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(junk food, is quality)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(apple pie, be good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, be good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(junk food, feel good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(junk food, be good for us)