pie: was thought of

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents apple pie
Weight: 0.75
, dish
Weight: 0.66
, dessert
Weight: 0.65
, item
Weight: 0.57
, junk food
Weight: 0.56
Siblings chocolate cake
Weight: 0.37
, meat pie
Weight: 0.37
, cheesecake
Weight: 0.36
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.36
, tiramisu
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
was thought of 1.00
was good 0.82
was made 0.78
was first made 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(pie, was thought of)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(cheesecake, was made)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(pie, was thought of)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(cheesecake, was made)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(cheesecake, was made)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(pie, was thought of)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(pie, was thought of)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(pie, was thought of)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pie, was good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(pie, was thought of)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(pie, was first made)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(pie, was thought of)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(pie, was good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(pie, was thought of)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(pie, was first made)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(pie, was thought of)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(pie, was good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(pie, was thought of)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(pie, was first made)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(pie, was thought of)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(pie, was good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(pie, was thought of)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(pie, was first made)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(pie, was thought of)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(pie, was thought of)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(pie, was thought of)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(pie, was thought of)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(pie, was thought of)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(pie, was thought of)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(cheesecake, was made)