pig: be one of most intelligent animal

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.72
, animal
Weight: 0.65
, pet
Weight: 0.65
, creature
Weight: 0.63
, mammal
Weight: 0.60
Siblings guinea pig
Weight: 0.73
, piglet
Weight: 0.67
, rabbit
Weight: 0.38
, cow
Weight: 0.38
, goat
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be one of most intelligent animal 1.00
be intelligent 0.88
be smart as dog 0.81
be a part of animal 0.81
be defined as only animal that have hair 0.80
be defined as animal which live in forest 0.76
be defined as young of pig may 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(mammal, be defined as only animal that have hair)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(pig, be one of most intelligent animal)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(pig, be one of most intelligent animal)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pig, be one of most intelligent animal)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pig, be one of most intelligent animal)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(mammal, be defined as only animal that have hair)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pig, be one of most intelligent animal)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(mammal, be defined as only animal that have hair)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pig, be one of most intelligent animal)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pig, be one of most intelligent animal)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, be a part of animal)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pig, be one of most intelligent animal)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(piglet, be defined as young of pig may)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(mammal, be defined as only animal that have hair)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(pig, be one of most intelligent animal)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(pig, be one of most intelligent animal)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(pig, be one of most intelligent animal)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(pig, be one of most intelligent animal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pig, be one of most intelligent animal)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(rabbit, be a part of animal)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(rabbit, be a part of animal)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pig, be one of most intelligent animal)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(piglet, be defined as young of pig may)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(piglet, be defined as young of pig may)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pig, be one of most intelligent animal)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(pig, be one of most intelligent animal)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pig, be one of most intelligent animal)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(pig, be intelligent)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(pig, be one of most intelligent animal)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(pig, be intelligent)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(pig, be one of most intelligent animal)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(pig, be smart as dog)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(pig, be one of most intelligent animal)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(pig, be smart as dog)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(pig, be one of most intelligent animal)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(pig, be intelligent)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pig, be one of most intelligent animal)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(pig, be smart as dog)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(pig, be one of most intelligent animal)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(pig, be smart as dog)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(pig, be one of most intelligent animal)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(pig, be intelligent)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(pig, be one of most intelligent animal)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(pig, be one of most intelligent animal)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pig, be one of most intelligent animal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pig, be one of most intelligent animal)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(pig, be one of most intelligent animal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pig, be one of most intelligent animal)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(mammal, be defined as only animal that have hair)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pig, be one of most intelligent animal)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pig, be one of most intelligent animal)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(rabbit, be a part of animal)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pig, be one of most intelligent animal)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(piglet, be defined as young of pig may)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(pig, be one of most intelligent animal)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(mammal, be defined as only animal that have hair)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(pig, be one of most intelligent animal)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)