pig: be train like dog

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.72
, animal
Weight: 0.65
, pet
Weight: 0.65
, creature
Weight: 0.63
, mammal
Weight: 0.60
Siblings guinea pig
Weight: 0.73
, piglet
Weight: 0.67
, rabbit
Weight: 0.38
, cow
Weight: 0.38
, goat
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be train like dog 1.00
be smart as dog 0.81
be chase by dog 0.79
be used to pet 0.78
be keep as pet 0.77
be pet 0.77
be at pet zoo 0.77
be use as pet 0.77
be at pet shop 0.77
be at pet store 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(pet, be used to pet)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(pig, be train like dog)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(animal, be used to pet)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(pig, be train like dog)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(animal, be pet)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(pig, be train like dog)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(animal, be at pet store)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(pig, be train like dog)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(pig, be train like dog)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(animal, be at pet store)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(pig, be train like dog)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(animal, be pet)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(pig, be train like dog)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(animal, be used to pet)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(pig, be train like dog)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(pet, be used to pet)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(pig, be train like dog)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pet, be used to pet)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(pig, be train like dog)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(animal, be used to pet)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(pig, be train like dog)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(animal, be pet)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(pig, be train like dog)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(animal, be at pet store)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(pig, be train like dog)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, be chase by dog)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(pig, be train like dog)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(goat, be at pet zoo)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(pet, be used to pet)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(pig, be train like dog)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(pig, be train like dog)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(animal, be used to pet)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(pig, be train like dog)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(pig, be train like dog)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(animal, be pet)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(pig, be train like dog)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(pig, be train like dog)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(animal, be at pet store)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(pig, be train like dog)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(pig, be train like dog)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(pig, be train like dog)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(goat, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(goat, be at pet zoo)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(pig, be train like dog)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(rabbit, be chase by dog)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(rabbit, be chase by dog)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(pig, be train like dog)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(pig, be train like dog)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(pig, be train like dog)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(pig, be smart as dog)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(pig, be train like dog)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(pig, be smart as dog)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(pig, be train like dog)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(pig, be smart as dog)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(pig, be train like dog)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(pig, be smart as dog)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(pig, be train like dog)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(pig, be train like dog)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(pig, be train like dog)

Typical implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(pig, be train like dog)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(pig, be train like dog)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(pig, be train like dog)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(pet, be used to pet)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(pig, be train like dog)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(animal, be used to pet)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(pig, be train like dog)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(animal, be pet)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(pig, be train like dog)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(animal, be at pet store)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(pig, be train like dog)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(rabbit, be chase by dog)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(pig, be train like dog)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(goat, be at pet zoo)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(pig, be train like dog)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(pet, be used to pet)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(pig, be train like dog)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(animal, be used to pet)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(pig, be train like dog)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(animal, be pet)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(pig, be train like dog)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(animal, be at pet store)