pig: has physical part hair

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.65
, pet
Weight: 0.65
, creature
Weight: 0.63
, mammal
Weight: 0.60
Siblings guinea pig
Weight: 0.73
, piglet
Weight: 0.67
, ruminant
Weight: 0.44
, rabbit
Weight: 0.38
, cow
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part hair 1.00
has physical part skin 0.90
has physical part teeth 0.86
has physical part body 0.85
has physical part legs 0.84
has physical part ears 0.83
has physical part tails 0.82
has physical part tail 0.82
has physical part nipples 0.81
has physical part neck 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(pig, has physical part hair)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(mammal, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(pig, has physical part hair)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(pig, has physical part hair)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(pig, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(mammal, has physical part hair)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(pig, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(pig, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(pig, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(pig, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(mammal, has physical part hair)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(pig, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(pig, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part ears)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(pig, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part tail)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(pig, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part tails)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(pig, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cow, has physical part tails)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(mammal, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(pig, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(pig, has physical part hair)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(pig, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(pig, has physical part hair)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(pig, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(pig, has physical part hair)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(pig, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(rabbit, has physical part ears)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(pig, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(cow, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(cow, has physical part tails)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(pig, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part tail)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(rabbit, has physical part tail)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(pig, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(rabbit, has physical part tails)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(pig, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(pig, has physical part hair)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(pig, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(pig, has physical part ears)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(pig, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(pig, has physical part ears)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(pig, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(pig, has physical part ears)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(pig, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(pig, has physical part tails)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(pig, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(pig, has physical part ears)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(pig, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(pig, has physical part tails)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(pig, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(pig, has physical part tails)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(pig, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(pig, has physical part tails)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(pig, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(pig, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(pig, has physical part hair)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(pig, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(pig, has physical part hair)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(pig, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part hair)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(pig, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(pig, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(pig, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(rabbit, has physical part ears)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(pig, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(rabbit, has physical part tail)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(pig, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(rabbit, has physical part tails)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(pig, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cow, has physical part tails)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(pig, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part hair)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(pig, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(pig, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)