pig: has physical part tusks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.65
, pet
Weight: 0.65
, creature
Weight: 0.63
, mammal
Weight: 0.60
Siblings guinea pig
Weight: 0.73
, piglet
Weight: 0.67
, ruminant
Weight: 0.44
, rabbit
Weight: 0.38
, cow
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part tusks 1.00
has physical part teeth 0.79
has physical part horns 0.77
has physical part legs 0.77
has physical part wattles 0.76
has physical part tail 0.76
has physical part hair 0.76
has physical part hooves 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(mammal, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(pig, has physical part tusks)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(pig, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(mammal, has physical part hair)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(pig, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(mammal, has physical part hair)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(pig, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(cow, has physical part horns)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(pig, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(cow, has physical part hooves)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(pig, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part tail)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(mammal, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(pig, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(pig, has physical part tusks)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(pig, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part tail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(rabbit, has physical part tail)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(pig, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(cow, has physical part horns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(cow, has physical part horns)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(pig, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(cow, has physical part hooves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(cow, has physical part hooves)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(pig, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(pig, has physical part tusks)

Similarity expansion

0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(pig, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(pig, has physical part hair)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(pig, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(pig, has physical part hair)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(pig, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(pig, has physical part hair)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(pig, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(pig, has physical part hair)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(pig, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(pig, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(pig, has physical part tusks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(pig, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(pig, has physical part tusks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(pig, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part hair)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(pig, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(cow, has physical part hooves)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(pig, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(rabbit, has physical part tail)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(pig, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(cow, has physical part horns)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(pig, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part hair)