pig: has state pet

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.72
, animal
Weight: 0.65
, pet
Weight: 0.65
, creature
Weight: 0.63
, mammal
Weight: 0.60
Siblings guinea pig
Weight: 0.73
, piglet
Weight: 0.67
, ruminant
Weight: 0.44
, rabbit
Weight: 0.38
, cow
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state pet 1.00
is good pet 0.94
has state pets 0.91
is good pets 0.83
make pets 0.83
is also pets 0.83
make good pets 0.81
is animal 0.81
have number as cat 0.81
be illegal as pets 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pig, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has state pets)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pig, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(guinea pig, has state pets)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pig, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, is good pets)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pig, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, make pets)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pig, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(guinea pig, is good pets)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pig, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(guinea pig, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(guinea pig, has state pets)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pig, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(rabbit, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(rabbit, has state pets)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pig, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(guinea pig, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(guinea pig, is good pets)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pig, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(rabbit, make pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(rabbit, make pets)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pig, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(rabbit, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(rabbit, is good pets)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pig, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(pig, has state pet)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(pig, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(pig, has state pets)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(pig, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(pig, has state pets)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pig, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(pig, has state pets)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(pig, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(pig, has state pets)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(pig, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(pig, is animal)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(pig, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(pig, is animal)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pig, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(pig, is animal)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(pig, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(pig, be illegal as pets)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(pig, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(pig, be illegal as pets)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pig, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(pig, be illegal as pets)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(pig, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(pig, be illegal as pets)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(pig, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(pig, is animal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(pig, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(pig, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pig, has state pet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pig, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(pig, has state pet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pig, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(guinea pig, is good pets)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pig, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(guinea pig, has state pets)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pig, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(rabbit, make pets)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pig, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rabbit, has state pets)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pig, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rabbit, is good pets)