pig: has state pets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.72
, animal
Weight: 0.65
, pet
Weight: 0.65
, creature
Weight: 0.63
, mammal
Weight: 0.60
Siblings guinea pig
Weight: 0.73
, piglet
Weight: 0.67
, ruminant
Weight: 0.44
, rabbit
Weight: 0.38
, cow
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state pets 1.00
make pets 0.93
is good pets 0.93
is also pets 0.93
has state pet 0.91
make good pets 0.90
be illegal as pets 0.88
is animals 0.85
is good pet 0.85
is dogs 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, is animals)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(pig, has state pets)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(pet, is dogs)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(pig, has state pets)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(pig, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(pet, is dogs)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(pig, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, is animals)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(pig, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(pet, is dogs)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(pig, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, is animals)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(pig, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has state pets)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(pig, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(guinea pig, has state pets)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(pig, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, is good pets)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(pig, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, make pets)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(pig, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(guinea pig, is good pets)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, is animals)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(pig, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(pig, has state pets)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(pet, is dogs)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(pig, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(pig, has state pets)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(pig, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(guinea pig, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(guinea pig, has state pets)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(pig, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(guinea pig, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(guinea pig, is good pets)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(pig, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(rabbit, make pets)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(rabbit, make pets)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(pig, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(rabbit, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(rabbit, has state pets)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(pig, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(rabbit, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(rabbit, is good pets)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(pig, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(pig, has state pets)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(pig, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(pig, is animals)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(pig, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(pig, is animals)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(pig, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(pig, has state pet)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(pig, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(pig, be illegal as pets)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(pig, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(pig, is animals)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(pig, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(pig, has state pet)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(pig, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(pig, be illegal as pets)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(pig, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(pig, be illegal as pets)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(pig, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(pig, be illegal as pets)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(pig, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(pig, has state pet)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(pig, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pig, has state pet)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(pig, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(pig, is animals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(pig, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(pig, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(pig, has state pets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(pig, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(pig, has state pets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(pig, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(pet, is dogs)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(pig, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(animal, is animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(pig, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(guinea pig, has state pets)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(pig, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(guinea pig, is good pets)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(pig, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rabbit, has state pets)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(pig, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(rabbit, make pets)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(pig, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rabbit, is good pets)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(pig, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(pet, is dogs)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(pig, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(animal, is animals)