pike: have rep

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.68
, predator
Weight: 0.58
, fish
Weight: 0.56
, county
Weight: 0.51
, man
Weight: 0.48
Siblings steelhead trout
Weight: 0.37
, rainbow trout
Weight: 0.36
, trout
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have rep 1.00
have bad rep 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pike, have rep) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(pike, have rep)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pike, have rep) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(pike, have bad rep)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(pike, have rep) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(pike, have bad rep)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(pike, have rep) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(pike, have bad rep)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(pike, have rep) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(pike, have bad rep)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(pike, have rep) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(pike, have rep) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(pike, have rep)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pike, have rep) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(pike, have rep)