pimp: grow nails

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents character
Weight: 0.59
, word
Weight: 0.56
, man
Weight: 0.56
, show
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.50
Siblings prostitute
Weight: 0.35
, whore
Weight: 0.33
, young man
Weight: 0.33
, young woman
Weight: 0.33
, old man
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
grow nails 1.00
have long nails 0.89
has physical part nails 0.86
paint nails 0.84
have long pinky nails 0.79
have pinky nails 0.79
have long fingernails 0.77
has physical part fingernails 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(pimp, grow nails)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(prostitute, have long nails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(pimp, grow nails)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(prostitute, has physical part nails)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(pimp, grow nails)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(old man, have long fingernails)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(pimp, grow nails)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(prostitute, has physical part nails)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(prostitute, has physical part nails)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(pimp, grow nails)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(prostitute, have long nails)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(prostitute, have long nails)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(pimp, grow nails)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(old man, have long fingernails)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(old man, have long fingernails)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(pimp, grow nails)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(pimp, grow nails)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(pimp, grow nails)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(pimp, paint nails)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(pimp, grow nails)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(pimp, paint nails)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(pimp, grow nails)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(pimp, has physical part nails)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(pimp, grow nails)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(pimp, has physical part fingernails)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(pimp, grow nails)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(pimp, paint nails)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(pimp, grow nails)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(pimp, has physical part nails)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(pimp, grow nails)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(pimp, has physical part fingernails)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(pimp, grow nails)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(pimp, have long nails)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(pimp, grow nails)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pimp, have long pinky nails)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(pimp, grow nails)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(pimp, has physical part nails)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(pimp, grow nails)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(pimp, paint nails)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(pimp, grow nails)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pimp, have pinky nails)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(pimp, grow nails)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(pimp, have long fingernails)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(pimp, grow nails)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(pimp, has physical part fingernails)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(pimp, grow nails)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(pimp, have pinky nails)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(pimp, grow nails)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(pimp, have pinky nails)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(pimp, grow nails)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(pimp, has physical part nails)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(pimp, grow nails)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(pimp, have pinky nails)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(pimp, grow nails)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(pimp, have long nails)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(pimp, grow nails)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(pimp, has physical part fingernails)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(pimp, grow nails)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(pimp, have long pinky nails)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(pimp, grow nails)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(pimp, have long pinky nails)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(pimp, grow nails)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(pimp, have long fingernails)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(pimp, grow nails)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(pimp, have long pinky nails)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(pimp, grow nails)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(pimp, have long nails)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(pimp, grow nails)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(pimp, have long nails)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(pimp, grow nails)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(pimp, have long fingernails)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(pimp, grow nails)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(pimp, have long fingernails)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(pimp, grow nails)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(pimp, grow nails)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(pimp, grow nails)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(pimp, grow nails)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(pimp, grow nails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(pimp, grow nails)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(prostitute, has physical part nails)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(pimp, grow nails)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(prostitute, have long nails)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(pimp, grow nails)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(old man, have long fingernails)