pimp: has physical part nails

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents character
Weight: 0.59
, word
Weight: 0.56
, man
Weight: 0.56
, show
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.50
Siblings prostitute
Weight: 0.35
, whore
Weight: 0.33
, young man
Weight: 0.33
, young woman
Weight: 0.33
, old man
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part nails 1.00
have long nails 0.91
has physical part fingernails 0.87
grow nails 0.86
paint nails 0.85
has physical part hair 0.85
have long pinky nails 0.81
have pinky nails 0.80
have long fingernails 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(man, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(pimp, has physical part nails)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(pimp, has physical part nails)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(man, has physical part hair)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(pimp, has physical part nails)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(man, has physical part hair)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(pimp, has physical part nails)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(prostitute, have long nails)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(pimp, has physical part nails)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(prostitute, has physical part nails)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(pimp, has physical part nails)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(old man, have long fingernails)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(man, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(pimp, has physical part nails)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(pimp, has physical part nails)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(pimp, has physical part nails)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(prostitute, has physical part nails)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(prostitute, has physical part nails)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(pimp, has physical part nails)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(prostitute, have long nails)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(prostitute, have long nails)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(pimp, has physical part nails)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(old man, have long fingernails)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(old man, have long fingernails)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(pimp, has physical part nails)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(pimp, has physical part nails)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(pimp, has physical part nails)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(pimp, paint nails)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(pimp, has physical part nails)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(pimp, have long nails)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(pimp, has physical part nails)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(pimp, grow nails)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(pimp, has physical part nails)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(pimp, has physical part hair)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(pimp, has physical part nails)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(pimp, paint nails)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(pimp, has physical part nails)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(pimp, grow nails)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(pimp, has physical part nails)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(pimp, has physical part fingernails)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(pimp, has physical part nails)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(pimp, grow nails)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(pimp, has physical part nails)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pimp, have long pinky nails)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(pimp, has physical part nails)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(pimp, has physical part hair)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(pimp, has physical part nails)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(pimp, has physical part fingernails)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(pimp, has physical part nails)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pimp, have pinky nails)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(pimp, has physical part nails)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(pimp, have long fingernails)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(pimp, has physical part nails)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(pimp, has physical part hair)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(pimp, has physical part nails)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(pimp, grow nails)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(pimp, has physical part nails)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(pimp, has physical part hair)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(pimp, has physical part nails)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(pimp, has physical part fingernails)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(pimp, has physical part nails)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(pimp, has physical part fingernails)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(pimp, has physical part nails)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(pimp, paint nails)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(pimp, has physical part nails)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(pimp, have long nails)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(pimp, has physical part nails)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(pimp, have pinky nails)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(pimp, has physical part nails)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(pimp, paint nails)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(pimp, has physical part nails)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(pimp, have long pinky nails)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(pimp, has physical part nails)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(pimp, have long fingernails)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(pimp, has physical part nails)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(pimp, have pinky nails)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(pimp, has physical part nails)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(pimp, have long nails)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(pimp, has physical part nails)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(pimp, have long pinky nails)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(pimp, has physical part nails)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(pimp, have pinky nails)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(pimp, has physical part nails)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(pimp, have long fingernails)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(pimp, has physical part nails)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(pimp, have long nails)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(pimp, has physical part nails)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(pimp, have long pinky nails)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(pimp, has physical part nails)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(pimp, have long fingernails)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(pimp, has physical part nails)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(pimp, has physical part nails)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(pimp, has physical part nails)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(pimp, has physical part nails)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(pimp, has physical part nails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(pimp, has physical part nails)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(man, has physical part hair)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(pimp, has physical part nails)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(prostitute, has physical part nails)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(pimp, has physical part nails)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(prostitute, have long nails)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(pimp, has physical part nails)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(old man, have long fingernails)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(pimp, has physical part nails)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(man, has physical part hair)