pine tree: have two different types of cones

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents evergreen
Weight: 0.62
, conifer
Weight: 0.61
, time
Weight: 0.38
, example
Weight: 0.36
, type
Weight: 0.26
Siblings pine
Weight: 0.38
, christmas tree
Weight: 0.37
, cedar
Weight: 0.37
, douglas fir
Weight: 0.36
, juniper
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have two different types of cones 1.00
have two types of cones 0.99
have cones years 0.91
produce cones 0.90
have two different types 0.87
have two types 0.86
have pine cones 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(evergreen, have pine cones)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(pine tree, have two different types of cones)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(pine tree, have two different types of cones)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(evergreen, have pine cones)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pine tree, have two different types of cones)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(evergreen, have pine cones)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(evergreen, have pine cones)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(pine tree, have two different types of cones)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(pine tree, have two different types of cones)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(pine tree, have two different types of cones)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(pine tree, have two different types of cones)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(pine tree, have two different types of cones)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(pine tree, have two types of cones)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(pine tree, have two different types of cones)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(pine tree, have two types of cones)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(pine tree, have two different types of cones)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(pine tree, have two types of cones)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(pine tree, have two different types of cones)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(pine tree, produce cones)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(pine tree, have two different types of cones)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(pine tree, produce cones)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(pine tree, have two different types of cones)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(pine tree, have cones years)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(pine tree, have two different types of cones)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(pine tree, have cones years)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(pine tree, have two different types of cones)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(pine tree, have pine cones)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(pine tree, have two different types of cones)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(pine tree, produce cones)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(pine tree, have two different types of cones)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(pine tree, have two different types)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(pine tree, have two different types of cones)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(pine tree, have two different types)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(pine tree, have two different types of cones)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(pine tree, have two types)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(pine tree, have two different types of cones)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(pine tree, have pine cones)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(pine tree, have two different types of cones)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(pine tree, have pine cones)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(pine tree, have two different types of cones)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(pine tree, have two types)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(pine tree, have two different types of cones)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(pine tree, have cones years)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(pine tree, have two different types of cones)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(pine tree, produce cones)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(pine tree, have two different types of cones)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(pine tree, have two different types)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(pine tree, have two different types of cones)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(pine tree, have two types)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(pine tree, have two different types of cones)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(pine tree, have cones years)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(pine tree, have two different types of cones)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(pine tree, have two types of cones)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(pine tree, have two different types of cones)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(pine tree, have two types)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(pine tree, have two different types of cones)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pine tree, have two different types)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(pine tree, have two different types of cones)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(pine tree, have pine cones)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(pine tree, have two different types of cones)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(pine tree, have two different types of cones)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pine tree, have two different types of cones)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(pine tree, have two different types of cones)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(pine tree, have two different types of cones)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pine tree, have two different types of cones)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(evergreen, have pine cones)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(pine tree, have two different types of cones)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(evergreen, have pine cones)