pine: be bad for rabbits

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wood
Weight: 0.70
, conifer
Weight: 0.67
, species
Weight: 0.66
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.61
Siblings cedar
Weight: 0.38
, cypress
Weight: 0.38
, birch
Weight: 0.38
, pine tree
Weight: 0.38
, mahogany
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for rabbits 1.00
be bad for rats 0.83
be bad for snakes 0.83
be bad for gerbils 0.81
be safe for cats 0.79
be bad for hamsters 0.77
animals of are friends 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pine, be bad for rabbits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(cedar, be bad for rabbits)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pine, be bad for rabbits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(cedar, be bad for rabbits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(cedar, be bad for rabbits)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pine, be bad for rabbits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(pine, be bad for rabbits)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pine, be bad for rabbits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(pine, be bad for snakes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pine, be bad for rabbits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(pine, be bad for rats)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(pine, be bad for rabbits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pine, be bad for rats)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pine, be bad for rabbits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(pine, be safe for cats)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(pine, be bad for rabbits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pine, be bad for snakes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(pine, be bad for rabbits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(pine, be bad for snakes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(pine, be bad for rabbits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(pine, be safe for cats)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(pine, be bad for rabbits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(pine, be safe for cats)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(pine, be bad for rabbits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(pine, be bad for rats)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pine, be bad for rabbits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(pine, be bad for gerbils)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(pine, be bad for rabbits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pine, be bad for gerbils)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(pine, be bad for rabbits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(pine, be bad for hamsters)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pine, be bad for rabbits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(pine, be bad for hamsters)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(pine, be bad for rabbits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(pine, be bad for hamsters)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(pine, be bad for rabbits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(pine, be bad for gerbils)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(pine, be bad for rabbits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(pine, be safe for cats)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(pine, be bad for rabbits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(pine, be bad for snakes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(pine, be bad for rabbits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(pine, be bad for rats)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(pine, be bad for rabbits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(pine, be bad for hamsters)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(pine, be bad for rabbits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(pine, be bad for gerbils)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(pine, be bad for rabbits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(pine, be bad for rabbits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pine, be bad for rabbits)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pine, be bad for rabbits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(pine, be bad for rabbits)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pine, be bad for rabbits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(cedar, be bad for rabbits)