pine: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wood
Weight: 0.70
, conifer
Weight: 0.67
, species
Weight: 0.66
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.61
Siblings cedar
Weight: 0.38
, cypress
Weight: 0.38
, birch
Weight: 0.38
, pine tree
Weight: 0.38
, mahogany
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is great 0.81
has shape solid 0.79
has quality resource 0.79
was very valuable product for inuit 0.77
has quality evenness 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(wood, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(pine, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(species, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(pine, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(species, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(wood, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(wood, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(species, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cedar, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mahogany, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(wood, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(pine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(pine, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(species, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(pine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(pine, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(mahogany, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(mahogany, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(cedar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(cedar, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(pine, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(pine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(pine, has quality bad)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(pine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(pine, has quality bad)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(pine, has quality bad)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(pine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(pine, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(pine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(pine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pine, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(pine, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(species, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(wood, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cedar, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(mahogany, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(pine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(species, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(pine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(wood, has quality good)