ping: has quality shit

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.60
, command
Weight: 0.58
, brand
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.53
, protocol
Weight: 0.53
Siblings ping pong
Weight: 0.35
, ajax
Weight: 0.32
, bing
Weight: 0.32
, fart
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality shit 1.00
has quality bad 0.79
has quality good 0.79
be in lol 0.77
affect much lol 0.77
has quality better 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(ping, has quality shit)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(brand, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(ping, has quality shit)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(ping, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(brand, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(ping, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(ping, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(ping, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(brand, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(ping, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(bing, has quality shit)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(ping, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bing, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(ping, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ajax, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(ping, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ping pong, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(ping, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bing, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(ping, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(fart, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(ping, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(ping, has quality shit)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(brand, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(ping, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(ping, has quality shit)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(ping, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(bing, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(bing, has quality shit)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(ping, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(fart, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(fart, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(ping, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(bing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(bing, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(ping, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(bing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(bing, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(ping, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(ajax, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(ajax, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(ping, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(ping pong, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(ping pong, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(ping, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(ping, has quality shit)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(ping, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(ping, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(ping, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(ping, be in lol)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(ping, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(ping, be in lol)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(ping, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(ping, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(ping, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(ping, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(ping, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(ping, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(ping, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(ping, be in lol)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(ping, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(ping, affect much lol)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(ping, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(ping, affect much lol)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(ping, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(ping, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(ping, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(ping, has quality better)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(ping, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(ping, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(ping, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(ping, affect much lol)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(ping, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(ping, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(ping, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ping, has quality better)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(ping, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(ping, has quality better)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(ping, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(ping, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(ping, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(ping, has quality better)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(ping, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(ping, affect much lol)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(ping, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(ping, be in lol)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(ping, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(ping, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(ping, has quality shit)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(ping, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(ping, has quality shit)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(ping, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(brand, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(ping, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(ping, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(bing, has quality shit)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(ping, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(bing, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(ping, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(ajax, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(ping, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(bing, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(ping, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fart, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(ping, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(ping pong, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(ping, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(brand, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(ping, has quality shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)