piracy: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.63
, challenge
Weight: 0.62
, activity
Weight: 0.59
, matter
Weight: 0.57
, act
Weight: 0.57
Siblings terrorism
Weight: 0.34
, pedophilia
Weight: 0.33
, terrorist
Weight: 0.33
, pornography
Weight: 0.32
, gambling
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality right 0.88
has quality wrong 0.87
is bad thing 0.79
is good thing 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(challenge, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(piracy, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(act, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(piracy, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(act, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(piracy, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(piracy, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(act, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(act, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(challenge, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(act, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(challenge, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(act, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(terrorism, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(terrorist, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(pornography, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pornography, has quality wrong)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality wrong)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality wrong)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(act, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(piracy, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(challenge, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(piracy, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(piracy, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(act, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(piracy, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(terrorism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(terrorism, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(terrorist, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(terrorist, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(gambling, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(gambling, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(gambling, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(gambling, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(pornography, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(pornography, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, has quality wrong)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(gambling, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(gambling, has quality wrong)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(pornography, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(pornography, has quality wrong)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(piracy, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(piracy, has quality good)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(piracy, has quality good)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(piracy, has quality good)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(piracy, has quality good)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(piracy, has quality right)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(piracy, has quality right)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(piracy, has quality right)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(piracy, is bad thing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(piracy, has quality wrong)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(piracy, is good thing)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(piracy, has quality wrong)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(piracy, has quality right)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(piracy, has quality wrong)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(piracy, is bad thing)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(piracy, has quality wrong)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(piracy, is good thing)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(piracy, is bad thing)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(piracy, is good thing)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(piracy, is bad thing)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(piracy, is good thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(piracy, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(piracy, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(act, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(act, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(challenge, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(terrorism, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(terrorist, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(pedophilia, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(pornography, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(pedophilia, has quality wrong)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(pornography, has quality wrong)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(gambling, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(gambling, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(gambling, has quality wrong)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(act, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(act, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(piracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(challenge, has quality good)