piracy: is technically illegal

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.63
, challenge
Weight: 0.62
, activity
Weight: 0.59
, matter
Weight: 0.57
, act
Weight: 0.57
Siblings terrorism
Weight: 0.34
, pedophilia
Weight: 0.33
, terrorist
Weight: 0.33
, pornography
Weight: 0.32
, gambling
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is technically illegal 1.00
is illegal 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(piracy, is technically illegal)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(gambling, is illegal)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(piracy, is technically illegal)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(terrorism, is illegal)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(piracy, is technically illegal)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is illegal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(piracy, is technically illegal)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(pedophilia, is illegal)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, is illegal)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(piracy, is technically illegal)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(terrorism, is illegal)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(terrorism, is illegal)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(piracy, is technically illegal)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(gambling, is illegal)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(gambling, is illegal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(piracy, is technically illegal)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(piracy, is technically illegal)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(piracy, is technically illegal)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(piracy, is illegal)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(piracy, is technically illegal)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(piracy, is illegal)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(piracy, is technically illegal)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(piracy, is illegal)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(piracy, is technically illegal)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(piracy, is illegal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(piracy, is technically illegal)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(piracy, is technically illegal)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(piracy, is technically illegal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(piracy, is technically illegal)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(piracy, is technically illegal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(piracy, is technically illegal)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(pedophilia, is illegal)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(piracy, is technically illegal)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(terrorism, is illegal)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(piracy, is technically illegal)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(gambling, is illegal)