pirate: eat in dark

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents film
Weight: 0.58
, option
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, adventure
Weight: 0.54
Siblings crew
Weight: 0.60
, black jack
Weight: 0.57
, davy jones
Weight: 0.54
, schooner
Weight: 0.40
, vampire
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
eat in dark 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(pirate, eat in dark)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(vampire, eat in dark)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(pirate, eat in dark)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(vampire, eat in dark)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(vampire, eat in dark)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(pirate, eat in dark)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(pirate, eat in dark)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(pirate, eat in dark)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(pirate, eat in dark)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(pirate, eat in dark)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(pirate, eat in dark)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(pirate, eat in dark)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(pirate, eat in dark)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(vampire, eat in dark)