pit: be at grind

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents trap
Weight: 0.61
, excavation
Weight: 0.58
, film
Weight: 0.56
, breed
Weight: 0.55
Siblings short circuit
Weight: 0.31
, gladiator
Weight: 0.30
, star trek
Weight: 0.29
, television show
Weight: 0.29
, movie
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at grind 1.00
be at under grind 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(excavation, be at under grind)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(pit, be at grind)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(pit, be at grind)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(excavation, be at under grind)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(pit, be at grind)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(excavation, be at under grind)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(excavation, be at under grind)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(pit, be at grind)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(pit, be at grind)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(pit, be at grind)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(pit, be at grind)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(pit, be at grind)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(pit, be at grind)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(pit, be at grind)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(pit, be at grind)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(pit, be at grind)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(pit, be at grind)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(excavation, be at under grind)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(pit, be at grind)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(excavation, be at under grind)