pit: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents trap
Weight: 0.61
, excavation
Weight: 0.58
, film
Weight: 0.56
, breed
Weight: 0.55
Siblings short circuit
Weight: 0.31
, dirty dancing
Weight: 0.30
, rear window
Weight: 0.30
, gladiator
Weight: 0.30
, star trek
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality good 0.94
has quality bad 0.90
has quality worse 0.90
be better than theatre 0.86
has quality worth 0.83
look better 0.81
be much better than real girls 0.80
look better than video 0.79
be much better than girls 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(trap, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(pit, has quality better)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(excavation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(pit, has quality better)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(film, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(pit, has quality better)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(trap, be much better than real girls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(pit, has quality better)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(trap, be much better than girls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(pit, has quality better)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(excavation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(pit, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(film, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(excavation, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(excavation, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(trap, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(trap, be much better than real girls)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(trap, be much better than girls)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(excavation, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(trap, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(excavation, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(trap, be much better than real girls)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(trap, be much better than girls)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(film, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(dirty dancing, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(short circuit, has quality worse)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(short circuit, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rear window, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(gladiator, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(star trek, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(gladiator, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(trap, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(pit, has quality better)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(excavation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(pit, has quality better)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(film, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(pit, has quality better)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(excavation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(pit, has quality better)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(trap, be much better than real girls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(pit, has quality better)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(trap, be much better than girls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(pit, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(dirty dancing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(dirty dancing, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(gladiator, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(gladiator, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(star trek, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(star trek, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(rear window, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(rear window, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(gladiator, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(gladiator, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(short circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(short circuit, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(short circuit, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(short circuit, has quality worse)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(pit, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(pit, has quality worth)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(pit, has quality worth)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(pit, has quality worth)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(pit, has quality worth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pit, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(pit, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(film, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(excavation, has quality bad)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(excavation, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(trap, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(trap, be much better than real girls)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(trap, be much better than girls)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(dirty dancing, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(short circuit, has quality worse)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(gladiator, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(star trek, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(gladiator, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(short circuit, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(rear window, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(film, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(excavation, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(trap, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(excavation, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(trap, be much better than real girls)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(pit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(trap, be much better than girls)