pitch: be alike

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents element
Weight: 0.61
, motion
Weight: 0.60
, material
Weight: 0.57
, factor
Weight: 0.57
, feature
Weight: 0.56
Siblings slider
Weight: 0.65
, cotton ball
Weight: 0.32
, rhythm
Weight: 0.31
, artificial turf
Weight: 0.31
, swing
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be alike 1.00
be alike in terms 0.86
be alike in terms of frequency 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(factor, be alike)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(pitch, be alike)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(pitch, be alike)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(factor, be alike)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(pitch, be alike)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(factor, be alike)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(factor, be alike)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(pitch, be alike)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(pitch, be alike)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(pitch, be alike)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(pitch, be alike)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(pitch, be alike)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(pitch, be alike in terms)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(pitch, be alike)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(pitch, be alike in terms)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(pitch, be alike)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(pitch, be alike in terms)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(pitch, be alike)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(pitch, be alike in terms)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(pitch, be alike)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(pitch, be alike in terms of frequency)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(pitch, be alike)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(pitch, be alike in terms of frequency)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(pitch, be alike)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(pitch, be alike in terms of frequency)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(pitch, be alike)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(pitch, be alike in terms of frequency)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(pitch, be alike)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(pitch, be alike)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(pitch, be alike)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(pitch, be alike)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(pitch, be alike)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(pitch, be alike)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(factor, be alike)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(pitch, be alike)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(factor, be alike)