placer: was mining method for gold

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents deposit
Weight: 0.46
, mining
Weight: 0.45
, county
Weight: 0.44
, area
Weight: 0.37
Siblings madison
Weight: 0.28
, county court
Weight: 0.27
, sheriff
Weight: 0.26
, jefferson
Weight: 0.26
, township
Weight: 0.26

Related properties

Property Similarity
was mining method for gold 1.00
was mining used method for gold 0.99
was mining method of mining for gold 0.98
was mining used method of mining for gold 0.98
was mining method o mining for gold 0.97
was mining used method o mining for gold 0.97
was mining widely used method of mining for gold 0.97
was mining method 0.96
was mining most widely used method of mining for gold 0.96
was mining widely used method o mining for gold 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(placer, was mining method for gold)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(placer, was mining method for gold)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(placer, was mining method for gold)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(placer, was mining used method for gold)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(placer, was mining method for gold)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(placer, was mining method of mining for gold)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(placer, was mining method for gold)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(placer, was mining used method of mining for gold)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(placer, was mining method for gold)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(placer, was mining used method for gold)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(placer, was mining method for gold)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(placer, was mining method)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(placer, was mining method for gold)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(placer, was mining method of mining for gold)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(placer, was mining method for gold)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(placer, was mining used method of mining for gold)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(placer, was mining method for gold)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(placer, was mining method o mining for gold)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(placer, was mining method for gold)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(placer, was mining used method o mining for gold)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(placer, was mining method for gold)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(placer, was mining widely used method of mining for gold)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(placer, was mining method for gold)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(placer, was mining method)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(placer, was mining method for gold)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(placer, was mining most widely used method of mining for gold)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(placer, was mining method for gold)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(placer, was mining widely used method o mining for gold)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(placer, was mining method for gold)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(placer, was mining used method o mining for gold)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(placer, was mining method for gold)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(placer, was mining method o mining for gold)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(placer, was mining method for gold)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(placer, was mining widely used method of mining for gold)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(placer, was mining method for gold)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(placer, was mining most widely used method of mining for gold)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(placer, was mining method for gold)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(placer, was mining widely used method o mining for gold)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(placer, was mining method for gold)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(placer, was mining used method for gold)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(placer, was mining method for gold)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(placer, was mining method)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(placer, was mining method for gold)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(placer, was mining used method of mining for gold)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(placer, was mining method for gold)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(placer, was mining method of mining for gold)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(placer, was mining method for gold)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(placer, was mining used method o mining for gold)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(placer, was mining method for gold)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(placer, was mining method o mining for gold)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(placer, was mining method for gold)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(placer, was mining widely used method of mining for gold)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(placer, was mining method for gold)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(placer, was mining most widely used method of mining for gold)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(placer, was mining method for gold)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(placer, was mining widely used method o mining for gold)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(placer, was mining method for gold)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(placer, was mining used method for gold)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(placer, was mining method for gold)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(placer, was mining method of mining for gold)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(placer, was mining method for gold)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(placer, was mining used method of mining for gold)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(placer, was mining method for gold)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(placer, was mining most widely used method of mining for gold)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(placer, was mining method for gold)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(placer, was mining widely used method of mining for gold)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(placer, was mining method for gold)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(placer, was mining method o mining for gold)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(placer, was mining method for gold)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(placer, was mining used method o mining for gold)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(placer, was mining method for gold)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(placer, was mining widely used method o mining for gold)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(placer, was mining method for gold)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(placer, was mining method)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(placer, was mining method for gold)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(placer, was mining method for gold)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(placer, was mining method for gold)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(placer, was mining method for gold)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(placer, was mining method for gold)