placer: was mining method of mining

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents deposit
Weight: 0.46
, mining
Weight: 0.45
, county
Weight: 0.44
, area
Weight: 0.37
Siblings madison
Weight: 0.28
, county court
Weight: 0.27
, sheriff
Weight: 0.26
, jefferson
Weight: 0.26
, township
Weight: 0.26

Related properties

Property Similarity
was mining method of mining 1.00
was mining used method of mining 1.00
was mining method of mining for gold 0.98
was mining used method of mining for gold 0.98
was mining method 0.98
was mining method o mining 0.98
was mining used method o mining 0.97
is mining 0.97
was mining used method 0.96
was mining widely used method of mining 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(placer, was mining method of mining)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(placer, was mining method of mining)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(placer, was mining method of mining)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(placer, is mining)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(placer, was mining method of mining)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(placer, was mining method)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(placer, was mining method of mining)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(placer, was mining used method)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(placer, was mining method of mining)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(placer, is mining)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(placer, was mining method of mining)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(placer, is mining)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(placer, was mining method of mining)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(placer, was mining used method of mining)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(placer, was mining method of mining)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(placer, was mining method)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(placer, was mining method of mining)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(placer, was mining used method o mining)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(placer, was mining method of mining)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(placer, was mining method o mining)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(placer, was mining method of mining)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(placer, was mining method of mining for gold)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(placer, was mining method of mining)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(placer, was mining used method of mining for gold)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(placer, was mining method of mining)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(placer, was mining method)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(placer, was mining method of mining)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(placer, was mining widely used method of mining)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(placer, was mining method of mining)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(placer, was mining used method)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(placer, was mining method of mining)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(placer, was mining used method of mining)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(placer, was mining method of mining)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(placer, was mining used method of mining)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(placer, was mining method of mining)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(placer, was mining used method)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(placer, was mining method of mining)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(placer, was mining method o mining)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(placer, was mining method of mining)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(placer, was mining used method o mining)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(placer, was mining method of mining)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(placer, was mining used method o mining)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(placer, was mining method of mining)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(placer, was mining method o mining)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(placer, was mining method of mining)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(placer, was mining widely used method of mining)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(placer, was mining method of mining)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(placer, was mining method of mining for gold)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(placer, was mining method of mining)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(placer, was mining widely used method of mining)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(placer, was mining method of mining)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(placer, was mining used method of mining for gold)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(placer, was mining method of mining)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(placer, was mining method of mining for gold)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(placer, was mining method of mining)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(placer, was mining used method of mining for gold)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(placer, was mining method of mining)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(placer, was mining method o mining)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(placer, was mining method of mining)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(placer, was mining used method of mining)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(placer, was mining method of mining)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(placer, was mining method of mining for gold)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(placer, was mining method of mining)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(placer, was mining used method o mining)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(placer, was mining method of mining)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(placer, was mining used method of mining for gold)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(placer, was mining method of mining)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(placer, was mining widely used method of mining)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(placer, was mining method of mining)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(placer, is mining)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(placer, was mining method of mining)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(placer, was mining method)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(placer, was mining method of mining)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(placer, was mining used method)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(placer, was mining method of mining)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(placer, was mining method of mining)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(placer, was mining method of mining)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(placer, was mining method of mining)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(placer, was mining method of mining)