plan b: was suzanne

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.63
, medication
Weight: 0.62
, option
Weight: 0.62
, act
Weight: 0.62
Siblings stock option
Weight: 0.34
, method
Weight: 0.32
, structure
Weight: 0.31
, assumption
Weight: 0.31
, paxil
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
was suzanne 1.00
was suzanne removed 0.89
was suzanne removed from itunes 0.85
is juliet 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(act, is juliet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(plan b, was suzanne)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(plan b, was suzanne) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(act, is juliet)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(plan b, was suzanne) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(act, is juliet)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(act, is juliet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(plan b, was suzanne) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(plan b, was suzanne)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(plan b, was suzanne) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(plan b, was suzanne)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(plan b, was suzanne) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(plan b, was suzanne removed)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(plan b, was suzanne) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(plan b, was suzanne removed)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(plan b, was suzanne) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(plan b, was suzanne removed from itunes)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(plan b, was suzanne) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(plan b, was suzanne removed from itunes)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(plan b, was suzanne) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(plan b, was suzanne removed from itunes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(plan b, was suzanne) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(plan b, was suzanne removed)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(plan b, was suzanne) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(plan b, was suzanne removed from itunes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(plan b, was suzanne) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(plan b, was suzanne removed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(plan b, was suzanne) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(plan b, was suzanne) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(plan b, was suzanne)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(plan b, was suzanne) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(plan b, was suzanne)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(plan b, was suzanne) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(act, is juliet)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(plan b, was suzanne) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(act, is juliet)