plan: be motivated by plan

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents proposal
Weight: 0.71
, concept
Weight: 0.65
, preparation
Weight: 0.60
, organization
Weight: 0.60
Siblings strategy
Weight: 0.65
, mission
Weight: 0.63
, architect
Weight: 0.63
, discussion
Weight: 0.62
, economy
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be motivated by plan 1.00
causes plan 0.90
plan build 0.87
plan goal and objective 0.79
complete floor plan 0.78
be essential but plan be useless 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(organization, plan goal and objective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(plan, be motivated by plan)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(plan, be motivated by plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(organization, plan goal and objective)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(plan, be motivated by plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(organization, plan goal and objective)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(plan, be motivated by plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(architect, complete floor plan)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(plan, be motivated by plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(architect, plan build)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(organization, plan goal and objective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(plan, be motivated by plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(plan, be motivated by plan)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(plan, be motivated by plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(architect, plan build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(architect, plan build)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(plan, be motivated by plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(architect, complete floor plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(architect, complete floor plan)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(plan, be motivated by plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(plan, be motivated by plan)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(plan, be motivated by plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(plan, causes plan)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(plan, be motivated by plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(plan, causes plan)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(plan, be motivated by plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(plan, be essential but plan be useless)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(plan, be motivated by plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(plan, be essential but plan be useless)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(plan, be motivated by plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(plan, be essential but plan be useless)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(plan, be motivated by plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(plan, causes plan)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(plan, be motivated by plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(plan, causes plan)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(plan, be motivated by plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(plan, be essential but plan be useless)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(plan, be motivated by plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(plan, be motivated by plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(plan, be motivated by plan)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(plan, be motivated by plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(plan, be motivated by plan)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(plan, be motivated by plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(organization, plan goal and objective)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(plan, be motivated by plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(architect, plan build)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(plan, be motivated by plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(architect, complete floor plan)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(plan, be motivated by plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(organization, plan goal and objective)