plan: be presented in field

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents proposal
Weight: 0.71
, amendment
Weight: 0.69
, concept
Weight: 0.65
, preparation
Weight: 0.60
Siblings blueprint
Weight: 0.77
, strategy
Weight: 0.65
, road map
Weight: 0.64
, mission
Weight: 0.63
, architect
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be presented in field 1.00
be presented in out field 0.98
be presented in when field 0.97
be presented in when out field 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(plan, be presented in field)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(plan, be presented in field)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(plan, be presented in field)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(plan, be presented in when field)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(plan, be presented in field)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(plan, be presented in out field)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(plan, be presented in field)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(plan, be presented in out field)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(plan, be presented in field)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(plan, be presented in when field)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(plan, be presented in field)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(plan, be presented in when out field)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(plan, be presented in field)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(plan, be presented in out field)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(plan, be presented in field)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(plan, be presented in when out field)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(plan, be presented in field)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(plan, be presented in out field)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(plan, be presented in field)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(plan, be presented in when field)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(plan, be presented in field)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(plan, be presented in when out field)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(plan, be presented in field)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(plan, be presented in when field)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(plan, be presented in field)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(plan, be presented in when out field)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(plan, be presented in field)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(plan, be presented in field)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(plan, be presented in field)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(plan, be presented in field)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(plan, be presented in field)