planning: be as function of managers

Property	Similarity
be as function of managers	1.00
be for managers	0.91
be as pervasive function of managers	0.90
be as function of management	0.89
be important process for managers	0.88
is management function	0.87
be as primary function of management	0.84
is primary management function	0.83
be as function	0.83
has quality function	0.80

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.16

Typical(planning, be as function of managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(planning, be for managers)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(planning, be as function of managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(planning, be as pervasive function of managers)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(planning, be as function of managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(planning, be for managers)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(planning, be as function of managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(planning, be important process for managers)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.16

Typical(planning, be as function of managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(planning, be as function)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(planning, be as function of managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(planning, be as function of management)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(planning, be as function of managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(planning, is management function)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.16

Typical(planning, be as function of managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(planning, be as function of management)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(planning, be as function of managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(planning, be as primary function of management)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(planning, be as function of managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(planning, is primary management function)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(planning, be as function of managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(planning, be as function)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.36

Plausible(planning, be as function of managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(planning, be for managers)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.16

Typical(planning, be as function of managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Typical(planning, is management function)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.36

Plausible(planning, be as function of managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(planning, be as function)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(planning, be as function of managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Salient(planning, be for managers)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(planning, be as function of managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Salient(planning, be as pervasive function of managers)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.36

Plausible(planning, be as function of managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(planning, be as function of management)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(planning, be as function of managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Salient(planning, be as function)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.16

Typical(planning, be as function of managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(planning, be as pervasive function of managers)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(planning, be as function of managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Salient(planning, be as function of management)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.36

Plausible(planning, be as function of managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(planning, is management function)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.36

Plausible(planning, be as function of managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Plausible(planning, be as pervasive function of managers)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(planning, be as function of managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Salient(planning, is management function)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(planning, be as function of managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(planning, be important process for managers)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(planning, be as function of managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Salient(planning, be as primary function of management)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(planning, be as function of managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Salient(planning, is primary management function)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.36

Plausible(planning, be as function of managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(planning, be important process for managers)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.36

Plausible(planning, be as function of managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(planning, be as primary function of management)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.16

Typical(planning, be as function of managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(planning, be as primary function of management)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.16

Typical(planning, be as function of managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(planning, be important process for managers)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.36

Plausible(planning, be as function of managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(planning, is primary management function)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.16

Typical(planning, be as function of managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(planning, is primary management function)

Parents	strategy Weight: 0.69 , stage Weight: 0.64 , step Weight: 0.62 , preparation Weight: 0.62
Siblings	marketing Weight: 0.34 , plan Weight: 0.34 , social engineering Weight: 0.33 , development Weight: 0.32 , approach Weight: 0.32

planning: be as function of managers

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings