planning: be as pervasive function

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents strategy
Weight: 0.69
, stage
Weight: 0.64
, step
Weight: 0.62
, preparation
Weight: 0.62
Siblings marketing
Weight: 0.34
, plan
Weight: 0.34
, social engineering
Weight: 0.33
, development
Weight: 0.32
, approach
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be as pervasive function 1.00
be as pervasive function of managers 0.93
be as function 0.83
be as function of management 0.79
has quality function 0.79
is management function 0.78
be as primary function 0.78
be as primary function of management 0.77
is primary management function 0.76
be important function in endeavor 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(planning, be as pervasive function)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(marketing, has quality function)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(planning, be as pervasive function)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(marketing, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(marketing, has quality function)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(planning, be as pervasive function)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(planning, be as pervasive function)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(planning, be as pervasive function)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(planning, be as function)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(planning, be as pervasive function)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(planning, be as pervasive function of managers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(planning, be as pervasive function)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(planning, be as pervasive function of managers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(planning, be as pervasive function)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(planning, be as pervasive function of managers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(planning, be as pervasive function)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(planning, be as function)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(planning, be as pervasive function)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(planning, be as pervasive function of managers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(planning, be as pervasive function)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(planning, be as function of management)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(planning, be as pervasive function)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(planning, is management function)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(planning, be as pervasive function)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(planning, be important function in endeavor)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(planning, be as pervasive function)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(planning, be as function)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(planning, be as pervasive function)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(planning, be as function)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(planning, be as pervasive function)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(planning, be as function of management)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(planning, be as pervasive function)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(planning, be as function of management)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(planning, be as pervasive function)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(planning, be as primary function)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(planning, be as pervasive function)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(planning, is primary management function)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(planning, be as pervasive function)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(planning, is management function)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(planning, be as pervasive function)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(planning, be as primary function of management)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(planning, be as pervasive function)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(planning, is management function)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(planning, be as pervasive function)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(planning, be as function of management)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(planning, be as pervasive function)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important function in endeavor)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(planning, be as pervasive function)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(planning, is management function)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(planning, be as pervasive function)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(planning, be important function in endeavor)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(planning, be as pervasive function)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(planning, be as primary function)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(planning, be as pervasive function)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(planning, be important function in endeavor)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(planning, be as pervasive function)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(planning, be as primary function of management)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(planning, be as pervasive function)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(planning, be as primary function)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(planning, be as pervasive function)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(planning, be as primary function)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(planning, be as pervasive function)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(planning, be as primary function of management)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(planning, be as pervasive function)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(planning, be as primary function of management)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(planning, be as pervasive function)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(planning, is primary management function)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(planning, be as pervasive function)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(planning, is primary management function)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(planning, be as pervasive function)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(planning, is primary management function)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(planning, be as pervasive function)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(planning, be as pervasive function)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(planning, be as pervasive function)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(planning, be as pervasive function)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(planning, be as pervasive function)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(planning, be as pervasive function)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(marketing, has quality function)