planning: be as primary function of management

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents strategy
Weight: 0.69
, stage
Weight: 0.64
, step
Weight: 0.62
, preparation
Weight: 0.62
Siblings marketing
Weight: 0.34
, plan
Weight: 0.34
, social engineering
Weight: 0.33
, development
Weight: 0.32
, approach
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be as primary function of management 1.00
is primary management function 0.99
be as primary function 0.94
be as function of management 0.93
is management function 0.91
be as function 0.85
be as function of managers 0.84
be important in management 0.84
is primary 0.84
has quality function 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(strategy, be important in management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(planning, be as primary function of management)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(planning, be as primary function of management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important in management)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(planning, be as primary function of management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in management)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(planning, be as primary function of management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(marketing, has quality function)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(strategy, be important in management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(planning, be as primary function of management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(planning, be as primary function of management)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(planning, be as primary function of management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(marketing, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(marketing, has quality function)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(planning, be as primary function of management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(planning, be as primary function of management)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(planning, be as primary function of management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(planning, is primary management function)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(planning, be as primary function of management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(planning, be as function of management)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(planning, be as primary function of management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(planning, be as primary function)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(planning, be as primary function of management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(planning, be as function)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(planning, be as primary function of management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(planning, be as function of management)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(planning, be as primary function of management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(planning, is management function)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(planning, be as primary function of management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(planning, is management function)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(planning, be as primary function of management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(planning, is primary management function)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(planning, be as primary function of management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(planning, be as function of management)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(planning, be as primary function of management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(planning, is management function)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(planning, be as primary function of management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(planning, be as primary function)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(planning, be as primary function of management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(planning, be as function of management)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(planning, be as primary function of management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(planning, is primary)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(planning, be as primary function of management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(planning, be as function)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(planning, be as primary function of management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(planning, be as function of managers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(planning, be as primary function of management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(planning, be as function)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(planning, be as primary function of management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(planning, be as function)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(planning, be as primary function of management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(planning, is management function)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(planning, be as primary function of management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(planning, be as function of managers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(planning, be as primary function of management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(planning, be as function of managers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(planning, be as primary function of management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(planning, be as primary function)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(planning, be as primary function of management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(planning, be as primary function)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(planning, be as primary function of management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(planning, is primary management function)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(planning, be as primary function of management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(planning, be as function of managers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(planning, be as primary function of management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(planning, is primary)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(planning, be as primary function of management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(planning, is primary management function)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(planning, be as primary function of management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(planning, is primary)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(planning, be as primary function of management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(planning, is primary)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(planning, be as primary function of management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(planning, be as primary function of management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(planning, be as primary function of management)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(planning, be as primary function of management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(planning, be as primary function of management)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(planning, be as primary function of management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in management)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(planning, be as primary function of management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(marketing, has quality function)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(planning, be as primary function of management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in management)