planning: be for hunting

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents strategy
Weight: 0.69
, stage
Weight: 0.64
, step
Weight: 0.62
, preparation
Weight: 0.62
Siblings marketing
Weight: 0.34
, plan
Weight: 0.34
, social engineering
Weight: 0.33
, development
Weight: 0.32
, approach
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be for hunting 1.00
be for hunting important 0.98

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(preparation, be for hunting important)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(planning, be for hunting)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(preparation, be for hunting)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(planning, be for hunting)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(planning, be for hunting)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(preparation, be for hunting)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(planning, be for hunting)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(preparation, be for hunting important)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(planning, be for hunting)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(preparation, be for hunting)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(planning, be for hunting)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(preparation, be for hunting important)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(preparation, be for hunting important)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(planning, be for hunting)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(planning, be for hunting)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(preparation, be for hunting)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(planning, be for hunting)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(planning, be for hunting)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(planning, be for hunting)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(planning, be for hunting)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(planning, be for hunting)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(planning, be for hunting important)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(planning, be for hunting)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(planning, be for hunting important)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(planning, be for hunting)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(planning, be for hunting important)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(planning, be for hunting)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(planning, be for hunting important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(planning, be for hunting)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(planning, be for hunting)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(planning, be for hunting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(planning, be for hunting)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(planning, be for hunting)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(planning, be for hunting)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(preparation, be for hunting)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(planning, be for hunting)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(preparation, be for hunting important)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(planning, be for hunting)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(preparation, be for hunting)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(planning, be for hunting)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(preparation, be for hunting important)