planning: be for hunting important

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents strategy
Weight: 0.69
, stage
Weight: 0.64
, step
Weight: 0.62
, preparation
Weight: 0.62
Siblings marketing
Weight: 0.34
, plan
Weight: 0.34
, social engineering
Weight: 0.33
, development
Weight: 0.32
, approach
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be for hunting important 1.00
be for hunting 0.98

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(preparation, be for hunting important)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(planning, be for hunting important)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(preparation, be for hunting)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(planning, be for hunting important)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(planning, be for hunting important)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(preparation, be for hunting)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(planning, be for hunting important)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(preparation, be for hunting important)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(planning, be for hunting important)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(preparation, be for hunting important)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(planning, be for hunting important)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(preparation, be for hunting)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(preparation, be for hunting important)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(planning, be for hunting important)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(planning, be for hunting important)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(preparation, be for hunting)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(planning, be for hunting important)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(planning, be for hunting important)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(planning, be for hunting important)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(planning, be for hunting important)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(planning, be for hunting important)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(planning, be for hunting)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(planning, be for hunting important)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(planning, be for hunting)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(planning, be for hunting important)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(planning, be for hunting)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(planning, be for hunting important)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(planning, be for hunting)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(planning, be for hunting important)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(planning, be for hunting important)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(planning, be for hunting important)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(planning, be for hunting important)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(planning, be for hunting important)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(planning, be for hunting important)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(preparation, be for hunting)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(planning, be for hunting important)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(preparation, be for hunting important)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(planning, be for hunting important)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(preparation, be for hunting)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(planning, be for hunting important)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(preparation, be for hunting important)