planning: be for outgoing calls

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents strategy
Weight: 0.69
, stage
Weight: 0.64
, step
Weight: 0.62
, preparation
Weight: 0.62
Siblings marketing
Weight: 0.34
, plan
Weight: 0.34
, social engineering
Weight: 0.33
, development
Weight: 0.32
, approach
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be for outgoing calls 1.00
be for outgoing calls helpful 0.96
be for calls 0.86
be for calls helpful 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(planning, be for outgoing calls)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(planning, be for outgoing calls)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(planning, be for outgoing calls)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(planning, be for calls)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(planning, be for outgoing calls)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(planning, be for calls)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(planning, be for outgoing calls)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(planning, be for calls)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(planning, be for outgoing calls)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(planning, be for calls)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(planning, be for outgoing calls)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(planning, be for calls helpful)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(planning, be for outgoing calls)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(planning, be for outgoing calls helpful)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(planning, be for outgoing calls)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(planning, be for calls helpful)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(planning, be for outgoing calls)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(planning, be for outgoing calls helpful)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(planning, be for outgoing calls)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(planning, be for outgoing calls helpful)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(planning, be for outgoing calls)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(planning, be for calls helpful)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(planning, be for outgoing calls)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(planning, be for outgoing calls helpful)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(planning, be for outgoing calls)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(planning, be for calls helpful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(planning, be for outgoing calls)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(planning, be for outgoing calls)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(planning, be for outgoing calls)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(planning, be for outgoing calls)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(planning, be for outgoing calls)