planning: be important in study

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents strategy
Weight: 0.69
, stage
Weight: 0.64
, step
Weight: 0.62
, preparation
Weight: 0.62
Siblings marketing
Weight: 0.34
, plan
Weight: 0.34
, social engineering
Weight: 0.33
, development
Weight: 0.32
, approach
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in study 1.00
be important to study 1.00
be important in scientific study 0.91
be important to scientific study 0.90
be important in work 0.80
be important in counselling 0.79
be important in science 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(preparation, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(planning, be important in study)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(preparation, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(planning, be important in study)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(planning, be important in study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(preparation, be important in work)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(planning, be important in study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(preparation, be important in science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important in study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(preparation, be important in science)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important in study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(preparation, be important in work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important in study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(development, be important in counselling)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(preparation, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(planning, be important in study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(planning, be important in study)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(preparation, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(planning, be important in study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(planning, be important in study)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(planning, be important in study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(development, be important in counselling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(development, be important in counselling)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(planning, be important in study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(planning, be important in study)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(planning, be important in study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important to study)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(planning, be important in study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(planning, be important to study)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(planning, be important in study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important in scientific study)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(planning, be important in study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important to scientific study)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(planning, be important in study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(planning, be important to study)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(planning, be important in study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(planning, be important to study)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(planning, be important in study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(planning, be important in scientific study)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(planning, be important in study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(planning, be important to scientific study)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(planning, be important in study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(planning, be important to scientific study)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(planning, be important in study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(planning, be important in scientific study)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(planning, be important in study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(planning, be important to scientific study)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(planning, be important in study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(planning, be important in scientific study)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(planning, be important in study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(planning, be important in study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important in study)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(planning, be important in study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(planning, be important in study)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important in study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(preparation, be important in work)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important in study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(preparation, be important in science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important in study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(development, be important in counselling)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(planning, be important in study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(preparation, be important in work)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(planning, be important in study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(preparation, be important in science)