planning: be important to business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents strategy
Weight: 0.69
, stage
Weight: 0.64
, step
Weight: 0.62
, preparation
Weight: 0.62
Siblings marketing
Weight: 0.34
, plan
Weight: 0.34
, social engineering
Weight: 0.33
, development
Weight: 0.32
, approach
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to business 1.00
be important in business 0.99
be important to small business 0.94
be in business 0.93
be to business 0.93
be for business 0.93
really is important to business 0.92
help business 0.88
be important to businesses 0.88
be important to success of business 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(preparation, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(planning, be important to business)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(strategy, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(planning, be important to business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(planning, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important to business)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(planning, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(preparation, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(preparation, be important in business)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important to business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(marketing, really is important to business)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(marketing, be important to success of business)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(marketing, be for business)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(marketing, be to business)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(marketing, be in business)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(marketing, help business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(preparation, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(planning, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(planning, be important to business)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(strategy, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(planning, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(planning, be important to business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(planning, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(marketing, be in business)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(marketing, be in business)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(planning, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(marketing, be to business)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(marketing, be to business)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(planning, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(marketing, be for business)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(marketing, be for business)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(planning, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(marketing, help business)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(marketing, help business)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(planning, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(marketing, really is important to business)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(marketing, really is important to business)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(planning, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(marketing, be important to success of business)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(marketing, be important to success of business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(planning, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(planning, be important to business)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(planning, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important in business)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(planning, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important to small business)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(planning, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(planning, be important in business)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(planning, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(planning, be important to small business)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(planning, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(planning, be important in business)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(planning, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(planning, be important in business)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(planning, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(planning, be important to small business)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(planning, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(planning, be important to small business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(planning, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(planning, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important to business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(planning, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(planning, be important to business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(strategy, be important to business)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(preparation, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(marketing, be in business)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(marketing, be to business)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(marketing, be for business)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(marketing, help business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(marketing, really is important to business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(marketing, be important to success of business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(planning, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(strategy, be important to business)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(planning, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(preparation, be important in business)