planning: be important to governments success

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents strategy
Weight: 0.69
, stage
Weight: 0.64
, step
Weight: 0.62
, preparation
Weight: 0.62
Siblings marketing
Weight: 0.34
, plan
Weight: 0.34
, social engineering
Weight: 0.33
, development
Weight: 0.32
, approach
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to governments success 1.00
be important to success 0.86
be important to success of business 0.85
contribute to success 0.81
contribute to organization success 0.80
be important companies have 0.77
contribute to organizational success 0.77
be important to businesses 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(preparation, be important to success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(planning, be important to governments success)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(planning, be important to governments success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(preparation, be important to success)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important to governments success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(preparation, be important to success)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important to governments success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(marketing, be important to success of business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important to governments success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(plan, be important companies have)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important to governments success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(development, contribute to organizational success)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(preparation, be important to success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(planning, be important to governments success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(planning, be important to governments success)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(planning, be important to governments success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(marketing, be important to success of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(marketing, be important to success of business)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(planning, be important to governments success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(development, contribute to organizational success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(development, contribute to organizational success)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(planning, be important to governments success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(plan, be important companies have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(plan, be important companies have)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(planning, be important to governments success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(planning, be important to governments success)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(planning, be important to governments success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(planning, contribute to organization success)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(planning, be important to governments success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(planning, contribute to organization success)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(planning, be important to governments success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(planning, contribute to organization success)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(planning, be important to governments success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(planning, contribute to organization success)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(planning, be important to governments success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(planning, be important to governments success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important to governments success)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(planning, be important to governments success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(planning, be important to governments success)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important to governments success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(preparation, be important to success)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important to governments success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(development, contribute to organizational success)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important to governments success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(plan, be important companies have)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important to governments success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(marketing, be important to success of business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(planning, be important to governments success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(preparation, be important to success)